🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to pass a proposal raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a solid starting point," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further access dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to mimic this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Beyond these regions, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies take a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this international debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and others indicate that policymakers internationally are no longer content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.